Soon publication of a new article, which I am co-author. This time, we will present a case study in the field of implementation of changes and team management during changes. The results of the research cover the organization in the process of transformation and major changes. For details, please click the link below:
Zapraszam średnie przedsiębiorstwa wytwórcze do udziału w procesie badawczym w ramach przygotowania pracy doktorskiej. Projekt nie ma charakteru komercyjnego.
Czym jest kontrola zarządcza?
W praktyce zarządzania z kontrolą utożsamiane są takie pojęcia jak kontrola wewnętrzna, kontrola zarządcza, audyt, kontroling a także nadzór korporacyjny. W literaturze międzynarodowej kontrola zarządcza (ang. management control) stanowi element systemu zarządzania ryzykiem w całym przedsiębiorstwie. Nie ogranicza się jedynie do funkcji kontroli – a więc sprawdzania, czy stan bieżący odpowiada planowanemu. Mój projekt naukowy ma na celu opracowanie modelu kontroli zarządczej wraz z procedurami wdrożenia dla średnich firm wytwórczych. Takie modele są dostępne od kilkudziesięciu lat dla dużych firmy, szczególnie korporacji. Efektywny system kontroli zarządczej powinien zapewniać zgodność działalności przedsiębiorstwa z celami strategicznymi i powiązanymi z nimi celami operacyjnymi, z prawem, oraz zasadami sprawozdawczości finansowej.
Co jest celem projektu i jak przebiega?
Projekt realizuję w ramach pracy naukowej przy założeniu jego praktycznego charakteru. Zapraszam średnie przedsiębiorstwa wytwórcze (produkcyjne/przemysłowe) do udziału w projekcie. Nie wiąże się to z żadnymi kosztami, ani ukrytymi intencjami.
Jakie są korzyści z udziału w badaniu?
Wszyscy uczestnicy badania otrzymają wersję elektroniczną pracy doktorskiej stanowiącej praktyczne kompendium wiedzy na temat planowania systemów kontroli zarządczej. Dane zawarte w referacie będą anonimowe.
Zapraszam do wsparcia działalności naukowej Wydziału Zarządzania Akademii Górniczo-Hutniczej w Krakowie.
Zapraszam do szybkiego i bezpośredniego kontaktu za pomocą czatu dostępnego z prawej strony ekranu albo formularza kontaktu dostępnego na tej stronie.
This element of implementing changes cannot be treated as closed in time. Throughout the cooperation period, the manager gets to know his employees during various professional and sometimes private situations. Getting to know employees, their expectations and preferences requires building appropriate relationships. To gain employees’ openness is to gain and maintain their trust. This can be achieved by the manager’s openness to various opinions and by enabling employees to express their tasks during conversations. As a result, an atmosphere of trust will be built and employees will openly inform about their problems and errors, allowing them to be quickly repaired and corrected.
An opportunity to understand employees’ attitudes are:
Training (desire for further development, position in the group, commitment)
Joint business trips (observation of field work, opportunity to learn about the private situation during informal conversations),
Talks with employees and heads of other departments about the quality of cooperation between organizational units and individual persons,
Each manager should get to know his employees in a different way than in professional situations. Often, living outside work affects decisions taken in professional life. Lack of knowledge of the private sphere of employees may in some cases lead to non-objective assessments of their work. On the other hand, care should be taken that excessive intimacy and empathy do not cause decision-making paralysis of the manager in difficult professional situations.
first stage of implemented changes should be the implementation of an effective
communication system with all team members. This is a fundamental task from the
point of view of implementing further changes. The diagnosis of the current
communication system may indicate the following dysfunctions:
No regular meetings with the management of the sales department, and no wider meetings with all employees in the department,
Lack of any system of reporting commercial activities to the supervisor except financial data automatically generated by the system,
Lack of use of available system tools to record and analyze commercial activities,
Lack of standard internal electronic correspondence.
In connection with the identified dysfunctions that prevent efficient management of the team, the manager should establish a system of meetings and briefings with sales department employees in order to:
Transmission and consultation of decisions,
Receiving feedback on problems,
Informing employees about long-term goals and tasks,
Informing employees about results and progress in strategic areas.
making managerial decisions, it should be noted that sales teams usually have
large but unstructured market knowledge. Additionally, individual employees
present a different attitude (openness) to proposed changes. Therefore, you
should take the following approach related to the personnel functions in the
First, catalog the tasks performed by employees,
Then diagnose the intensity of these tasks and distribution to individual team members,
Perform a full mapping of the customer service process to be able to identify step by step its positive elements building a stream of value for the customer, and those points that for the final recipient did not constitute any added value,
Present and discuss with the whole team the conclusions of this analysis and ask for an opinion on the proposed directions of change,
Start implementing changes and monitor implementation progress,
Engage directly in processes.
In this process, the manager should assume the position of an active participant in changes, involving all interested employees in order to obtain the widest possible perspective and dynamics of reorganization.
In the context of the process of implementing changes, the manager should be guided by his own concept, which will be based on a checklist that allows analyzing the organization in terms of the value stream for clients. This may be due to the following premises:
The team has not previously dealt with modern management systems,
Employees are apprehensive, mainly afraid of job losses,
The pay scale is below market standards,
Recruitment of new team members is time consuming and requires significant expenditure (team verification will be unavoidable anyway),
It is necessary to motivate employees to learn new things and perform more demanding tasks.
should be remembered that a manager cannot suddenly or drastically make a
slowdown or even stop the sales and customer service processes. Therefore, the
manager should adopt the concept of implementing changes based on intense
motivation factors that will lead to increased involvement in work and building
employee openness to new challenges. The basis for all decisions made will be
team cooperation as a basic element of work culture in the entire sales
department and the company.
This article begins a series of 12 parts about implementing organizational changes in the sales department. Today, we all have a little more time for conceptual and analytical work. May we come to practice as soon as possible. Let’s prepare for a great dynamic of work after the crisis.
main task of the sales manager who reorganizes the sales department is to
increase work efficiency. Therefore, the goal is to increase the sales volumes
of products offered by the company, and increase revenues while maintaining
adequate profitability. Realization of the goal requires multi-faceted action
covering all areas of the company’s operations. However, focusing on direct
contact with current and potential customers, the foundation is to build an
effective sales team – motivated to the effort of broad expansion on the
domestic and international market.
managerial analysis can reveal many problem areas that negatively affect work
results, and cause numerous dysfunctions in collaboration within the team. Here
is an example list of problems:
Lack of clear division of competences between employees,
Overloading tasks of some employees and wasting time by others,
Significant discrepancies in remuneration for the same positions in no way justified by skills or the scope of tasks,
No delegation of responsibility for carrying out tasks,
Lack of reporting system and feedback from managers,
Taking over tasks from other organizational units that should not be located in sales department tasks,
Lack of preparation for direct work with clients resulting from lack of practice and concerns about their skills,
No use of appropriate IT tools for sales support.
As a result, the sales department is characterized by many administrative functions, performing in fact a passive “Back Office” function in relation to customers. The sales model of such an organized sales department is based on old habits, and the poor organization of work and the lack of a system of incentives for employees do not allow for more ambitious sales results. Activities targeted at clients are characterized by stagnation and a lack of willingness, but also a lack of competence and beliefs to change the work model.
I will publish the next part next week. Subscribe to this blog to receive a notification.